In today’s New York Times is an Op-Ed piece entitled “Paying a Price, Long After the Crime.” It touches upon some of the issues that have been covered on this blog concerning the increasing marginalization of ex-offenders in all aspects of daily life, from employment to education to housing, and provides proposals as to how those in power may seek to reintegrate ex-offenders into society. On the latter point and in addition to what the authors have proposed, I would simply add the following: that we consider a fundamental shift in our perception of the capacities and desires of an ex-offender from an individual with a presumed criminal bent to someone who, if given the chance, greatly wishes to contribute to society, perhaps (gasp!) more so than those from different (read: more conforming) walks of life.
Join 226 other subscribers
Subscribe to the Blog\’s RSS Feeds
About the BlogA criminal defense and civil rights blog in Atlanta, Georgia, dedicated to the "invisible man."
About the AuthorAlbert Wan is a criminal defense and civil rights attorney in Atlanta, GA.
Visit my website
Search The Invisible Man
Post CategoriesAtlanta News Bad Politics Baseball Civil Rights Clemency Collateral Consequences Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Death Penalty Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Georgia News Immigration Immigration Law International News Journalism Personal Police Corruption Postconviction Matters Social Justice Solo Practice News U.S. News U.S. Supreme Court Uncategorized
Tag, You’re It!ACLU Adam Liptak Adverse Collateral Consequences Alliance for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Baseball Brian Nichols Brooklyn Dodgers Brown v. Board of Education Chaidez Chaidez v. United States Civil Rights collateral consequence Creative Steps Day Camp criminal history Criminal Law Dallas Morning News Death Penalty Discrimination Due Process Effective Assistance of Counsel Election Day Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Executive Clemency Expungement Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Florida Supreme Court Fourth Amendment George Orwell Georgia Department of Corrections Georgia Public Defender Standards Council Hillary Clinton Immigration Immigration Consequences Income Inequality Independence Day Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Invisible Man John G. Roberts Journalism Julia Tuttle Causeway Juvenile Justice Kurt Vonnegut Maricopa County Martin Luther King Jr. Miami-Dade Miranda v. Arizona national lawyer's guild New York Mets New York Times Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Northeast Philadelphia Opening Day Padilla v. Kentucky Peachtree Road Race Police Misconduct Postconviction Presidential Pardon Ralph Ellison Retroactivity Sandy Hook school shooting Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Sex Offender Laws Sheriff Joe Arpaio Sonia Sotomayor South Carolina Southern Center for Human Rights Syria TalkLeft Teague v. Lane Terrorism The Valley Swim Club Tony Judt U.S. Supreme Court Voting Rights Act
I love your blog! I believe that an individual who has paid his or her debt to society and who has learned and change from the mistake should not have to go back to prison. This is the case of many immigrants who after being convicted of a crime lose their “legal status” and in order to get a work permit the individual has to be detain for a period of at least six months under the custody of INS.
When a husband or wife is being detained by INS in such a case, the family goes through a lot of hardships. The family is separated and this can cause separation anxiety to children, economic and emotional distress. This is a great nation and it is very sad that our immigration laws have become emotionally detached to the reality of many families.